Turkish Women’s Social Practices and Political Views : A sociological approach
Abstract
The end of the second world war rendered women more visible in society as a result of questioning meta-narratives imposed by the thinkers of enlightened and reason era. Studies on women in Turkey have been quite prolific lately. However, more thorough and detailed descriptions need to be provided to understand social practices of women so that important issues and problems can be better understood. This study focused on four women living in the south of Turkey. The study was a case study based on semi-structured interviews, direct and indirect observations, journals and field notes. The elements of the study were composed of daily routines, social practices, political views and general views about children, education, gender, city, neighbors, neighborhood and work.
The results of the study show that the participants had differing views about conceptualization of the elements. They also developed a critical perspective towards their current situation and constructed ideal representations. In addition, they stated that their political views also affected their positioning in the society. All of them emphasized that inequality was the prevalent problem that they experienced because dominance of masculinity was perceived as a pivotal problem form their perspective. Although two participants were working as civil servants, they noted that they found themselves at a disadvantage and had extra burdens at home. All of the participants also mentioned gender discrimination both at home and at work.
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations.
Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
Aguayo, B. E. C. (2008). Global villages and rural cosmopolitanism: Exploring
global ruralities. Globalizations, 5(4), 541-554.
doi:10.1080/14747730802500281
Ahlstedt, S. (2015). Doing "feelwork": Reflections on whiteness and methodological
challenges in research on queer partner migration. In R. Andreassen & K. Vitus
(Eds.), Affectivity and race: Studies from Nordic contexts (pp. 185–202). Farnham,
UK: Ashgate.
Cartwright, D. P. (1953). Analysis of Qualitative Material. (Eds: L. Festinger and D. Katz). Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 421-470.
Cherry, A. L. (2005). Examining Global Social Welfare Issues. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Kaymaz, İ. Ş. (2010). Çağdaş Uygarlığın Mihenk Taşı: Türkiye’de Kadının Toplumsal Konumu. Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi, 12(46).
Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel Arastırma Yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to is Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü (Çev: Osman AKINHAY ve Derya KÖMÜRCÜ). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Pişkin, M. ve U. Öner (1999). Görüşme İlkeleri ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Siyasal Yayıncılık.
Ridgeway, C. L. and S. J. Correll (2000). Limiting Inequality through Interaction: The End(s) of Gender. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1).
Savcı, İ. (1999). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Teknoloji. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
HOW DO YOU REGISTER and SUBMIT AN ARTICLE?